Action Items

As parks and trails in King County have been developed for recreation over the past dozen years, area residents have come to rely more and more on these lands for hiking, trail running, mountain biking and equestrian use. Levy funds have contributed significantly to the development of the Grand Ridge, Cougar Mountain and Soaring Eagle trail systems, among others.

Now the King County Council has approved a property tax levy to fund King County Parks through 2019. This measure will be going to King County voters in August.

Levies have been a critical element of the funding mix for King County Parks. The 2013 King County Parks Levy will fund ongoing maintenance on recreation facilities in King County Parks, as well as planning and implementation of potential new trail connections in the South Sound. This is a continuation of a current levy, not new money. If approved, this levy would replace two voter-approved measures that will expire in 2019. Raising 18.7 cents per $1,000 of assessed value -- or about $56 on a property valued at $300,000 -- the levy will raise between $59 million and $70 million annually.

WTA volunteers have worked hard to maintain King County trails over the years, and we've enjoyed a strong relationship with the County. This levy is essential to maintaining and improving the vital trail systems throughout the King County Park system.

YES on the King County Parks Levy

WTA strongly supports this lid lift, and we encourage WTA members to vote YES when you receive your ballot in the mail, likely in mid-July. Everyone who loves King County Parks will be grateful that you did!

The Washington State Legislature is in extra innings, and funding for Washington State Parks is at stake.

The House and Senate wrapped up their regular session without agreeing on a budget. In fact, they adjourned with competing proposals that are $2 billion apart. Lawmakers are back in Olympia, May 20 to come to agree on a final budget.

• The House raises new revenue and funds basic services at higher levels, including $23.7 million for State Parks.
• The Senate raises no new revenue and makes deep cuts, including cutting $5 million from the already-slim 2011-2013 State Parks Operating allocation, bringing them to $16 million.

WTA supports the general funding of 23.7 million for State Parks in the House budget. Furthermore, WTA is excited by an amendment offered by Representative Larry Seaquist that would match each dollar of Discover Pass revenue with a dollar of general fund. That would benefit all three Discover Pass agencies, and would help State Parks dig out of its chronic budget hole.

We are also asking for a $50,000 appropriation to the Recreation and Conservation Office to study the potential implementation of a joint State Lands/National Forest Pass.

Here's how you can help:

Please call the legislative hotline at 1.800.562.6000. When connected with your Washington State Legislators, ask them to:

• Support the House version of State Parks funding at 23.7 million.
• Support the Seaquist Amendment to HB 1935 for sustainable funding for State Parks, DNR and Fish and Wildlife.
• Support WTA's request for $50,000 to RCO to study a joint State Lands/National Forest Pass.

Yesterday in Olympia the Washington State House released its operating budget. A line item that WTA has been awaiting with anticipation was the funding level it would provide for Washington State Parks. The Washington Senate's budget came out last week, and it is not surprising that the amount designated for State Parks differs in the two proposals.

State Parks fares much better in the House version than in the Senate. Here's the breakdown:

• House: State Parks will receive $23.7 million for the 2013-2015 biennium, which is a $2.5 million increase over the current 2011-2013 funding period.
• Senate: Allocates $16.5 million to State Parks for the next biennium, which constitutes a nearly $5 million cut from the current amount.

The House budget is very similar to the one that Governor Inslee released earlier this year and represents a relatively stable funding amount compared to what State Parks currently is receiving. With this level of funding, the system will continue to limp along as State Parks advocates work to build pressure for better budget outcomes in coming sessions to address serious maintenance and facility backlogs and ranger staffing levels.

The Senate budget, however, will continue the sharp decline in park facilities that we've seen over the past several years and could result in the full or partial closure of many state parks. That Washington State Parks might be faced with closing facilities in the midst of its centennial year is disheartening. We should be reinvesting in parks rather than turning our backs on them.

How to help state parks

Please take a moment to call your Senator and Representatives. Let them know that you appreciate the hard budget decisions that must be made this session but make sure that they understand the value and importance of our state public lands to your family, to our state's economy and to Washington's overall quality of life. Share your experience enjoying these special places and urge the legislature to support the House of Representative's request of $23.7 million in general funding for State Parks.

Here are some tips for calling elected officials:

• Call the legislative hotline: 1.800.562.6000 and ask for your senator's office.
• Identify yourself (tell them if you are a constituent) and why you are calling: "I believe that Washington needs a budget that invests in our state parks. Please support $27 million in General Fund appropriations for Parks."
• Keep your call short and courteous.
• Remember to thank the staff member for his or her time.

Thank you for speaking out for trails!

Washington State Parks turn 100 this year, and they're showing their age. But you can help them.

> Please call your state senator and ask them to reinvest in our state parks.

Starting to see the impact of cuts

The legislature has cut general funding for State Parks by 79 million dollars since 2007. These devastating cuts have resulted in seasonal closures, reduced services and deferred maintenance. If we don't reverse this trend, we could see some of the crown jewels of our park system closed due to concerns for public safety and the environment.

This week, The Seattle Times released an informative article highlighting some of the problems facing our park system:

"Since 2000, the state has shed 12 of its parks, reduced hours at others, and shifted 66 of its 189 full-time rangers to seasonal jobs. Starting in 2009, the state parks have reduced staffing from 595 full-time permanent employees to 395."

"The situation has gotten so bad that Gov. Jay Inslee and key state lawmakers say they are considering restoring some state tax dollars to fund the parks."

Hikers and campers have likely already seen some of the effects in their favorite parks. The article details a few examples:

"At Lake Wenatchee State Park, storm damage downed so many trees that more than half of the campsites are unusable, with the recreation season fast approaching. Cleanup is slower, with fewer year-round staff to tackle the mess."

"Meanwhile, all over the state, portions of trails, scenic overlooks and campgrounds are cordoned off because there is no money to repair or maintain them."

The legislature is currently developing their 2013-2015 budget, so this is the time to speak up for parks.

How to help state parks

Call your state senator and tell him or her that we need to reinvest in our state parks. Share your experience enjoying these special places and urge the legislature to support $27 million in general funding for State Parks.

Here are some tips for calling elected officials:

• Call the legislative hotline: 1.800.562.6000 and ask for your senator's office.
• Identify yourself (tell them if you are a constituent) and why you are calling: "I believe that Washington needs a budget that invests in our state parks. Please support $27 million in General Fund appropriations for Parks."
• Keep your call short and courteous.
• Remember to thank the staff member for his or her time.

Thank you for speaking out for trails!

Last week, when our elected officials in Washington, D.C. decided not to act on a "sequestration" deadline, they set in motion a set of fiscal cutbacks that could dramatically impact hiking and other recreation on federal lands. Seasonal hiring for the backcountry, trail work, reduced hours and even closures are at stake in this latest showdown.

Three scenarios: shut down, sequestration or status quo

The latest deadline is now March 27. On that day, one of three things will happen:

• Congress does nothing, and the federal government shuts down. As in 1995, when a showdown between the Clinton administration and Congress resulted in a government shutdown, that would mean that many essential services of government would be shuttered, including National Parks, National Wildlife Refuges, National Forest ranger stations and more.

• Congress passes a continuing resolution that includes sequestration cuts. These are automatic across-the-board spending cuts of up to five percent. They would likely mean that land management agencies would not be able to hire essential summer-season staff (wilderness rangers, backcountry trail crews, visitor center employees, etc.) and may have to reduce hours or in some cases close visitor services, campgrounds or other facilities.

• Congress passes a continuing resolution at current levels, which means status quo funding. By kicking the can down the proverbial curb, drastic cuts would be averted for now, but the underlying issue would simply be put off once again.

Ask Congress to preserve your public lands

If you don't want to see the devastating impacts of a government shutdown or sequestration cuts, please contact your U.S. Senators and U.S. Representative with an email, phone call (see tips) or letter. Let them know how important public lands and recreation are to Washington's hikers. Ask them to preserve critical funding for our National Forests, National Parks and National Wildlife Refuges.

Contact our Senators

>> Sen. Patty Murray
>> Sen. Maria Cantwell

Look up and contact your Representatives

Not sure who represents you? Look it up here.

>> Rep. Suzan DelBene [1st]
>> Rep. Rick Larsen [2nd]
>> Rep. Jaime Herrera Beutler [3rd]
>> Rep. Doc Hastings [4th]
>> Rep. Cathy McMorris Rodgers [5th]
>> Rep. Derek Kilmer [6th]
>> Rep. Jim McDermott [7th]
>> Rep. David Reichert [8th]
>> Rep. Adam Smith [9th]
>> Rep. Denny Heck [10th]

Thank you!

Last Friday was a big day in Olympia. The first big legislative deadline passed, on which date bills had to make it out of their committee of origin or be consigned to reintroduction next legislative session.

A number of bills touching on the Discover Pass were introduced this session. Some of them are still kicking, some could come back in another form and others will not reemerge until session is over. The legislature will now start talking seriously about the biennial budget. This is where the real action starts, and we're already seeing some movement to fund State Parks at $27 million - in line with the request WTA made at Lobby Day on February 7. Everyone who attended Lobby Day should give themselves a vigorous pat on the back!

Here's the rundown with a little editorializing on each bill that effects hikers.

Living, breathing bills

• SB 5084: Creates a $5 lifetime disability Discover Pass and has been referred to Ways and Means. While WTA is sensitive to the importance of access to state lands for disabled people, the legislature must reckon with the cost of providing reduced-price passes.
• SB 5289: Ends the requirement that requires people driving on Department of Natural Resources (DNR) or Fish and Wildlife roads to display a Discover Pass. People parking at recreation facilities must still have a pass. It also allows agencies to sell Discover Passes in bulk at less than $30 per pass to retailers and partners. There is no mechanism to account for revenue lost from discounting, and WTA is concerned that this approach could result in lost potential revenue. SB 5289 is eligible for a Senate floor vote.
• SB 5097: Allows married couples to combine their volunteer hours for the purpose of earning a complimentary Discover Pass. The legislation has passed the Senate and been referred to the House Community Development, Housing and Tribal Affairs Committee.
• SB 5391: Allows off-road vehicles (ORVs) bearing an ORV decal and operating in an ORV area to not carry a Discover Pass. The vehicle in which the ORV operator towed his or her ORV is still subject to the Discover Pass requirement. This legislation has been referred to Senate Ways and Means. While we have some concerns about the revenue impacts of this proposal, we understand that the requirement to carry two passes could be irksome to ORV operators.
• HB 1935: Matches each Discover Pass sold with an equal amount of general fund money. WTA enthusiastically supports this proposal, which also reimburses State Parks for the free or reduced-cost passes that the legislature has required them to provide. Finally, it allows State Parks license plate holders to access State Parks without a Discover Pass. HB 1935 has been referred to the Appropriations Committee in the House.
• SB 5513: This is a very complex piece of legislation that creates a legislative definition of a four-wheeled ATV, requires ATVs to have metal plates issued with ORV registration, and allows ORVs to be used on roads posted under 35 MPH in municipalities under 15,000 residents, unless prohibited by local ordinance. While the metal plate benefits law enforcement, the fact that local roads are open unless posted closed to ATVs should be reversed; towns should be able to choose on a case-by-case basis which roads they open up. This legislation has been referred to the Senate Transportation Committee, but has not been heard. It has until tomorrow (Friday, March 1) to move out of Committee.
• SB 5653: This legislation expands the role of the State Parks Foundation and allows Washington State Parks to enter into public-private partnerships and, like HB 1935, dedicates $27 million to State Parks over the next biennium. However, this legislation includes the same bulk Discover Pass sales provision that we are concerned about in SB 5289. We clearly support the general fund appropriation element of this bill, but have concerns about the bulk sale provision. SB 5653 has been referred to Senate ways and Means.

Bills that are over, at least for now

• SB 5319: This bill would have provided a free Discover Pass to anyone with a lifetime veteran's disability pass issued by the state, and would have waived Discover Pass citations for anyone who could prove that they hold such a pass. While it received a hearing, it did not make it out of Senate Natural Resources and Parks Committee.
• SB 5266: SB 5266 would have made purchasing the Discover Pass opt-out at the time of vehicle tab renewal, increasing the number of passes sold significantly. This legislation did not receive a hearing in its committee of origin.
• HB 1755: This is the companion bill to SB 5391. While SB 5391 received a hearing in time, HB 1755 did not.
• HB 1632: HB 1632 is the House companion bill to SB 5513. The latter legislation may still receive a vote in time, since it was introduced in Senate Transportation. The former did not.

The jury is still out

Last week, WTA Executive Director Karen Daubert and board members Amy Csink and Jeff Chapman and I traveled to Washington, DC. Over three days, we met with both of our U.S. Senators, seven members of Washington's Congressional delegation, and key staff from the three remaining Congressional districts. We had an excellent reception at all the offices we visited and raised issues critical to the Washington's hikers. And while news is mixed out of DC, many members are hopeful that we can avoid the massive across-the-board cuts that all agencies will feel if Congress and the Administration do not cut a fiscal deal by March 1 that avoids sequestration.

Washington Trails Association's lead issues were fiscal in nature:

• Forest Service Appropriations: The last fiscal year saw a decline in a critical element of the Forest Service budget -- the Capital Maintenance of Trails (CMTL) program -- which is key to the continued development of new trails, maintenance of existing facilities and completion of backlog maintenance. We asked our delegation to support $560 million for that program, a slight increase over FY 2011 appropriations. Members supported that allocation, and we saw some movement in the direction of fighting for that amount.
• Federal Lands Recreation Enhancement Act (FLREA) Reauthorization: The legislation that authorizes the Forest Service to charge user fees such as the Northwest Forest Pass expires in December 2014. While fees are not the solution to Forest Service budget woes, they are an important element of paying for recreation on our public lands. We urged our delegation to support reauthorization and to work together to introduce more flexibility into the program, supporting measures that will ensure that the Forest Service can spend more money on actual trail maintenance. There is broad agreement within the Forest Service and the recreation community on the sorts of changes that need to be made to FLREA.

Last Wednesday, the Outdoor Industry Association (OIA) released a state-by-state breakdown of the economic benefits of outdoor recreation. The new data add more detail to a report on the national economic impact of outdoor recreation that the association released last year. The short story is that the outdoor industry in Washington State is responsible for $22.5 billion in direct sales, $7.1 billion in wages and salaries, $1.6 billion in tax revenues and 226,000 jobs. All of that economic activity is dependent upon a healthy, well-managed system of trails and other recreation facilities on public lands.

The picture this report paints is startling, but not unexpected. Some of the most successful outdoor retailers in the country are based here:  REI, Outdoor Research, Marmot and the family of brands owned by Cascade Designs are all based in the Seattle area. And with three National Parks, a vast swathe of National Forest land, 120 State Parks and lovely Department of Natural Resources recreation areas, Washington attracts and keeps hikers like a magnet.

All of this recreation activity leads to jobs with both land management agencies and outdoor retailers, and tax revenues for gateway communities across the state. In a year when sequestration at the federal level and budget cuts at the state and local level might imperil recreation opportunities, it would behoove elected officials to take a long look at the benefits that all those hikers, equestrians, mountain bikers, family campers and birdwatchers provide to the state and consider the consequences of slashing budgets for land management agencies.

The country's latest fiscal stand-off, known widely as "sequestration," is set to commence on March 1. Should Congress and President Obama fail to come to a fiscal agreement, one of the primary consequences would be five percent across-the-board budget cuts. Leaked documents from the National Park Service demonstrate the broad and adverse impacts that these cuts would cause, including more than $1.6 million in cuts from Washington's three national parks. Only two options avoid sequestration -- agreement around a solution to the problem or passage of a continuing resolution that maintains funding levels at current (or perhaps slightly lower) rates.

In a memo dated January 25, 2013, NPS Director Jonathan Jarvis directed each park unit to make a sequestration plan that reduces its budget by five percent by February 11. New details from the Coalition of National Park Service Retirees emerged today about what that would mean at some of the largest national parks, including Mount Rainier National Park.

In the meantime, the Park Service has instituted a hiring freeze. This comes at a time when hiring decisions are usually being made for seasonal staff who handle the massive influx of summer crowds. At some parks, it is possible that no seasonal staff would be hired should these cuts become mandatory.

What would a five percent mean for Washington’s three national parks?

• Mount Rainier National Park, would need to carve $604,000 from a $12.1 million budget. At minimum, this could include the closure of the Ohanapecosh Visitor Center this year.
• Olympic National Park would have to cut $639,000 from a $12.8 million budget.
• North Cascades National Park would face a $365,000 reduction from a 7.3 million budget.

Each of these parks rely heavily on seasonal personnel during the busy summer months. Eliminating these positions would have a serious effect on hours of operation, wilderness rangers, preservation, maintenance and much, much more. These cuts could also have a chilling effect on local economies.

The National Park Service also operates six other sites in Washington that would face five percent cuts: San Juan National Historic Preserve, Lake Roosevelt National Recreation Area, Ebey’s Landing National Historic Reserve, Fort Vancouver and the Whitman Mission National Historic Sites and the Klondike Gold Rush Museum.

And, of course, these are examples from just one agency. Sequestration would impact the U.S. Forest Service and other agencies in similar ways, and we can assume that they are having similar discussions that have not been made public. Let’s hope that our elected officials come to their senses and come to a budget agreement before March 1.

Today, WTA is releasing its first ever State Of Access Report. Hikers have had roads on their radar since 2003, when major storms wiped out access to the Glacier Peak Wilderness and many other beloved places. But our public lands road system has been facing a slow-motion crisis since the decline of the timber industry. National Forests paid to build a huge system of roads, many of which are still used to access trailheads, with timber receipts. Those roads were frequently not built to the most sustainable standard, and have begun to crumble in the intervening years.

That's where the State Of Access Report enters the picture. WTA has created a framework for analyzing forest roads based on the importance of roads to hikers, the cost of repairing or rerouting and the environmental consequences of both repairing the road and its use by vehicles. We used those criteria to analyze eight roads:

1. Suiattle River Road: Critical access to the heart of the Glacier Peak Wilderness that has been thoroughly studied and is ready for repair.
2. Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Road: A successful collaboration of land management agencies and the public to rehabilitate an important recreation area. A paving project should be completed by 2015.
3. Carbon River Road: A dynamic landscape rendered road realignment unfeasible, making this road an ideal conversion to a hiker/biker trail to a wilderness campground.
4. Dosewallips River Road: An important access road that should be reopened as new repair standards can offer access to the west side of the Olympics.
5. Stehekin Road: A little-used mountain road that should not be repaired. Relocation would require realignment of the wilderness boundary, as well as the Pacific Crest Trail.
6. Illabot River Road: A well-built road threatened by a lack of funding for maintenance that nevertheless should remain open.
7. Mountain Loop Highway: A critical recreation access road requiring major repairs on a regular basis necessitates continued investment.
8. Mitchell Peak Road: DNR should seek to take all reasonable steps to secure an easement for recreational travel.

Each of these roads exemplifies an issue or course of action that drives decision-making around recreation routes. For instance, Illabot illustrates the decisions that land managers are forced to make when they have too little money to manage their road systems. The Middle Fork Snoqualmie River Road is an example of a successful collaborative approach between agencies and the public that has resulted in a more sustainable road and a safer backcountry experience.

A surprising road was the Dosewallips. When the criteria was applied to this route, we realized that agency planning processes since the 2008 Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS) had solved many of the problems that WTA had anticipated for the rerouted section of road. WTA decided that, in light of new information, to change its view on this road, and now believe that it should be reopened. At the time, we made the best determination we could with the information available to us. But we felt it was important to revisit the project and change our minds as new information became available.

Please take a moment to download a pdf of the State Of Access Report. It will give you a window into the often-difficult decision making process that we enter when we consider roads that are failing or washed out. It's our conviction that this document can help hikers make their own decisions and give them the tools to influence land managers and elected officials.

More than 200 forested acres adjacent to Cougar Mountain and the Cougar/Squak Corridor may be logged if the King County Department of Natural Resources does not succeed in acquiring the property. Previously owned by the now-bankrupt Issaquah Camping Club and American West Bank, the property was purchased by Erickson Logging, based in Eatonville. Residents around the parcels are concerned about more frequent flooding of May Creek due to increased siltation of the creekbed caused by logging. And hikers who love the Issaquah Alps worry about the lost opportunity for connecting Cougar Mountain to the Cougar/Squak Corridor.

King County DNR wants to purchase the property in an unlogged state. These lands are significantly more important from a recreation and ecosystem services perspective if the original forest is standing. But they do not currently have the funding to purchase the parcels in question. Erickson Logging is the definition of a willing seller, but King County has no control over their use of the land without a standing purchase agreement. And without funding, they can't enter into such an agreement.

The King County Conservation Futures Program could be the answer here. Created in 1982, Conservation Futures was envisioned as a tool to ensure that the rush to develop the region did not happen at the expense of green space. Funded by a nickel on each $1000.00 of a property's valuation, the program allows for the outright acquisition of green space or the purchase of conservation easements.

King County is seriously considering including purchase of this property in their request to the Conservation Futures Oversight Committee. We urge members of the Committee to support this proposal when it is considered in March, and we hope you'll do the same. For more information on these parcels and King County's work, contact Ingrid Lundin at King County Parks. Her email address is ingrid.lundin@kingcounty.gov.

Take a look at a map of Olympic National Park sometime (soon, I hope) and you'll notice that the very few roads that penetrate the Park boundary don't do so very deeply. That's because the vast majority of the Park is designated wilderness.

Like every wilderness statewide, Olympic National Park's wilderness acres are designated under the Wilderness Act, which defines wilderness as ". . . a tract of undeveloped federal land of primeval character without permanent improvements or human habitation; an area where the earth and its community of life are untrammeled by man, where man himself is a visitor who does not remain . . .". And like nearly every other wilderness, it has a management plan that, you guessed it, plans its management. But this crucial document has not been updated since 1980. This year, Olympic National Park will take up a new Wilderness Stewardship Plan.

The first step is known as scoping. Think of scoping as drawing the boundaries of the plan. The public and agency staff work together to come up with the issues that the Park will cover. From there, Park staff will release a Draft Environmental Impact Statement (DEIS), consider public comments, and release a Final Environmental Impact Statement (FEIS).

Now is a great time for you to put your stamp on the Plan. Please take a few moments to read the scoping newsletter. Even better, go to one of the public scoping meetings that the Park is holding across the Puget Sound region. Meetings will be held in the evenings in the following locations. You can read the details about where and when here:

• 2/5: Port Angeles
• 2/7: Sequim
• 2/19: Sekiu
• 2/20: Forks
• 2/21: Amanda Park
• 3/4: Seattle
• 3/5: Silverdale
• 3/6: Shelton

Getting involved in the management of the lands you love is very rewarding. You'll be glad you made the effort.

Washington's hikers don't need to be told about the Alpine Lakes Wilderness. So I hope you'll forgive me if I gush for a moment of lines about the needling peaks, glittering lakes and deep forest strongholds just 45 minutes from Seattle. Okay, that's out of my system.

Will this be the year?

I'm really writing today to tell you that Senator Murray and Congressman Reichert have joined with co-sponsors Senator Cantwell and Congresswoman DelBene to reintroduce legislation aimed at protecting 20,000 acres adjacent to the Alpine Lakes Wilderness and designating both the Middle Fork Snoqualmie and Pratt Rivers as Wild and Scenic. This important legislation has cleared every legislative hurdle other than Senate passage.

WTA has supported these additions from the beginning, and we'll continue working with our partners to help move this legislation to final passage. The proposal has been thoroughly vetted and enjoys the support of dozens of elected officials, businesses and non-profit organizations.

Congressman Reichert originally introduced this legislation in late 2007, when his district encompassed the proposal area. Since then, Washington has undergone redistricting, which has moved this part of the Alpine Lakes from his District into Congresswoman DelBene's. It is a sign of his commitment to this legislation, as well as a bipartisan spirit in Washington's Congressional delegation, that he continues to champion the proposal with the wholehearted support of Congresswoman DelBene. They, along with Senators Murray and Cantwell are to be commended.

We will keep you posted as this bill goes forward. In the meantime, if you are in the Eighth Congressional District (Congressman Reichert) or First Congressional District (Congresswoman DelBene), please take a quick moment to call or email both House sponsors with your support. Regardless of your district, a call of thanks to Senators Murray and Cantwell is also in order.

The 2013 state legislative session opened in Olympia Monday, and WTA is already working on advocating for issues that are important to hikers, including funding to keep Washington State Parks open, safe and maintained.

The lay of the land in Olympia

This promises to be one of the most interesting legislative sessions I've seen in my 12 years as WTA's Advocacy Director. After the November elections, Democrats in the Senate held a 26-23 vote majority. But in a twist, two Democrats joined the 23-member Republican caucus, giving the newly-formed 25 member coalition the power to select a Senate Majority Leader and appoint Committee Chairs and members.

One of the Democrats who joined the coalition—Senator Rodney Tom, of Bellevue—was chosen as Senate Majority Leader, and most Committees are now chaired by Republicans.

Join us at lobby day to stand up for trails

WTA prides itself on working across party lines, so we're as excited as always to rejoin the fray in Olympia and advocate for some issues that are important to hikers. Here is a quick sample of the issues we'll focus on this year:

• State Parks' Budget Woes: State Parks has seen its share of the state's General Fund decline from $98 million in the 2007 biennium to $17 million in the 2011-2013 budget. This year, that number may fall to zero. Outgoing Governor Christine Gregoire allocated $19 million to State Parks in her proposed budget. State Parks has asked for $27 million. Given the importance of State Parks to our economy and quality of life, we think this is an important investment. WTA supports State Parks' funding request.
• Joint State/Forest Service Pass: We've heard loud and clear that our members and other hikers would like to see a joint pass that provides access to both state and federal lands. To that end, we'll work with legislators to get funding in the Operating Budget that will assess the best way to structure a joint pass.

On December 14, Washington Senators Patty Murray and Maria Cantwell introduced S. 3683, legislation that would protect the Green Mountain Lookout in the Glacier Peak Wilderness.

The legislation comes after a group based out of Montana filed a lawsuit against the US Forest Service (USFS) for using a helicopter and machinery to repair Green Mountain Lookout in federally sanctioned wilderness within the Mount Baker-Snoqualmie National Forest. As a result, a U.S. District Court ordered the USFS to remove the lookout in March.

At that time, the federal judge granted the USFS time to assess how best to comply with his order to take down the lookout, and to date it still stands atop Green Mountain. Since then, U.S. Congressman Rick Larsen and Senators Murray and Cantwell have been working to preserve the lookout through legislative means. Friday's action was a step towards doing just that.

Green Mountain has been a beloved hiking destination for generations of Washingtonians, who value the lookout for the glimpse of Washington's vanishing history that it provides. More importantly, the judge's order to remove the lookout could have sweeping consequences for wilderness efforts nationwide, as it would make lawmakers much more nervous about fighting for any new wilderness that might contain even slight evidence of past human habitation or use.

That's why this legislation is so welcome. It's a necessary corrective to a ruling that went too far. Should it pass and be signed by President Obama, hikers will be able to visit and appreciate this historic structure for many more years. And worthy additions to the Wilderness Preservation System will not have a new impediment to their progress.

Please take a moment to contact Senators Murray and Cantwell and thank them for this important bill. Let them know that they have your support in this ongoing effort to preserve the Green Mountain Lookout.

A new report from Headwaters Economics (a non-partisan economic research group), titled West is Best: Protected Public Lands Promote Jobs and Higher Incomes focuses on the critical role that the West's public lands base plays in supporting Washington's economy.

The report provides new evidence for something WTA has known for years: outdoor recreation opportunities play an important role in population and job growth.

Protected federal lands help create jobs

One of the report's most striking findings is that counties containing more than 30% federally protected lands saw job growth of 345 percent from 1970-2010, while those with 0 percent of their landscapes in federal protection saw only 83 percent growth.

Job growth percentage grows steadily as protected land percentages move from 0 to 30 percent. Per capita income is also $6,540 higher in counties with 150,000 acres of protected land compared to counties with no protected land.

Protected public lands attract companies and workers

The report also found that protected public lands are key to attracting companies, entrepreneurs and workers. In short, Washington's incredible recreation opportunities make it a great place to live and work. In the executive summary, Headwaters Economics says it found:

• Entrepreneurs and talented workers are choosing to work where they can enjoy outdoor recreation and natural landscapes.

• Increasingly, chambers of commerce and economic development associations in every western state are using the region’s national parks, monuments, wilderness areas and other public lands as a tool to lure companies to relocate.
• High-wage services industries also are using the West’s national parks, monuments, wilderness areas and other public lands as a tool to recruit and retain innovative, high-performing talent.

Data continues to underscore importance of public lands to the economy

From the Outdoor Industry Association's (OIA) work to quantify the economic benefits of outdoor recreation, to this report, there has been a groundswell of data emerging on this topic.

These reports should be a signal to elected officials that public lands are an economic driver and that investments in the places that we all love yield huge returns.

More information

> Read the full report online.

> Check out Headwaters Economics interactive graphics for Washington state.

This week, the Gifford Pinchot National Forest gave the go-ahead for a Canadian mining company to begin exploratory drilling on Goat Mountain, a setback in the ongoing fight to protect Goat Mountain Trail (#217) and Mount St. Helens Monument from mining threats.

Mining to be limited to 63 holes at 23 sites

Forest officials released a 'Decision Notice and Finding of No Significant Impact' on exploratory drilling near Goat Mountain on the northeast corner of Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument. Ascot Resources, a British Columbia mining company, can now begin to drill 63 holes at 23 sites to assess cores for the presence of gold, silver, copper and molybdenum.

Fighting for Goat Mountain since 2006

WTA's 2006 and 2007 Endangered Trails Reports listed Goat Mountain due to mining threats. At the time, Idaho General Mines and General Moly were attempting to site mining operations at Goat Mountain. Those companies withdrew their proposals and Ascot stepped in with its exploratory proposal. While smaller in scale than a mine, exploratory drilling opens the door for larger operations.

We have grave concerns about potential mining at Goat Mountain. This project has the potential to obliterate the lovely Goat Mountain Trail, permanently impact the Lewis River Horse Camp and to seriously damage wildlife habitat. Mining in the shadow of Mount St. Helens strongly conflicts with the environmental and scientific purpose of the Monument.

The final cut is that these lands were purchased by the Nature Conservancy and donated to the Forest Service to protect it from development. At the time of the donation, the Gifford Pinchot National Forest Supervisor said that the acquisition would "...aid in the preservation of the scenic beauty of this area which is to become an important Monument portal.”

Sign up to help us protect Goat Mountain

WTA is coordinating with other statewide and regional organizations to protect the Goat Mountain Trail and these important public lands.

> Sign up for Take Action Network alerts, and we will keep you posted with new developments and let you know how you can help.

The Discover Pass just got a lot more flexible. When you order a Discover Pass online from some vendors (see links below), you can now specify the day you want it to start within the next year, which makes it easier to give as a holiday gift to your favorite hiker.

The pass grants access to (and directly funds) state lands, including State Parks, the Department of Fish and Wildlife lands and the Department of Natural Resources lands. The added "choose your date" option is the result of legislation that Washington Trails Association and hiker advocates helped pass earlier this year.

How to choose your start date

If you want to buy a hiker a Discover Pass for a holiday gift, but don't want the pass to start until, say, April, here's how you do it:

1. You can purchase a Discover Pass with a flexible start date directly from the Department of Natural Resources or from one of these vendors.
2. Choose the activation date during purchase. Activation must start within 365 days of your date of purchase. When purchasing online, you must allow 10 days for mailing when you select a future start date.
3. When you get your pass, remember that it's transferable between two cars. Just write in the license plates of both cars on the pass. (See the example to the right.)

WTA-sold Discover Passes start at purchase date

Because WTA doesn't have the machine that prints out the start and expiration date, any Discover Pass you purchase through our online store starts the day you buy it. You can purchase the Discover Pass from us any time of year, but you just don't have the option to the delay the start date on it.

More information about passes

>> For more information, visit discoverpass.wa.gov or call 1-866-320-9933.

>> To learn about the Discover Pass and other recreation passes and permits, please visit our Recreation Pass Info page.

>> State Park hiking ideas all winter long.

Repairs to the Suiattle River Road—a key access road for hikers—may finally become a reality.

Earlier this month, the Federal Highways Administration Western Federal Lands Division released their 'Finding of No Significant Impact' on repairs to the Suiattle River Road. The finding is the culmination of work that Federal Highways and the Darrington Ranger District have undertaken to repair damaged sections of the Suiattle River Road and to reopen it to hikers seeking access to the heart of Glacier Peak Wilderness.

"Repairing the Suiattle has taken on the tone of an Icelandic saga"

Landslides resulting from floods in 2003 and 2006 have kept this road—and hikes to the wildflower meadows of Green Mountain, the old growth forest of Downey Creek and western access to a stunning section of the Pacific Crest Trail—closed past milepost 12, effectively locking out hikers from some great trails in the Cascades.

Since then, repairing the Suiattle has taken on the tone of an Icelandic saga, with three Environmental Assessments, a Categorical Exclusion, a lawsuit and an Access and Travel Management Plan. But the new finding indicates that work will finally commence on repairing this immensely important recreational access road.

Hiker voices help clear the way for repairs

Washington Trails Association has worked with the agencies every step of the way on the Suiattle, writing substantive comments on all the Environmental Assessments and coordinating multi-group comments with organizations who share our values of preserving important places and providing public access to them

Thanks to everyone who commented, attended public meetings and otherwise showed support for repairs to the Suiattle. We will let you know when work on the road commences.

Washington Trails Association is always working to make the voice of hikers heard. Whether we are talking to Senators in Washington D.C. about the Forest Service's budget, to state legislators about the importance of keeping our public lands open or to local forest rangers about which trails hikers want to see better maintained—we are working for you.

We also try to connect you with direct ways to speak up. Here are three upcoming ways to make your voice heard right now:

November 14 - Mapping how visitors value the Olympic Peninsula

7 p.m. – 9 p.m. at the Mountaineers Program Center, Goodman B
7700 Sand Point Way NE, Seattle, WA 98115

Bring your personal stories and thoughts about the places you love on the Olympic Peninsula. Using a process known as Human Ecology Mapping, the Mountaineers will be gathering information to help the Forest Service identify areas of high value and intense use for future land management and planning activities on the Olympic Peninsula.

>>Learn how to participate.

November 19 Mount St. Helens Community Meeting

5 p.m. - 7 p.m. at the Gifford Pinchot National Forest Headquarters
10600 NE 51 Circle Vancouver, WA 98682

The Mount St. Helens National Volcanic Monument, is holding a public meeting to outline the progress that the Forest and its partners have made implementing the Monument’s Strategic Investment Plan. Leaders from surrounding counties, the Mount St. Helens Institute, the Cowlitz Economic Development Council, and other partners will share their progress. After the presentations, participants will break into small groups to provide input into a variety of stakeholder issues and opportunities at the Monument.

>>Read the Strategic Investment Plan here.

November to January - Online public meetings ask you questions about the future of outdoor recreation in Washington

The Washington State Recreation and Conservation Office (RCO) is hosting online meetings as part of its revision to the state’s strategic plan for outdoor recreation. The forum will ask the public a series of questions, and you can participate at any time of day.

Right now RCO wants to know: what do you think about the commercialization of parks. What do you think about allowing advertising or corporate naming rights in our public parks?

>>New questions will be added regularly, so make sure you bookmark this page.

>> Interested in discovering more ways to get involved? Make sure you sign up for WTA’s Trail Action Network so all the last advocacy information is sent directly to your email box.