You are here: Home » Trail News » Signpost Blog » Mount Dickerman and Lake 22 Parking Lots Closed
Document Actions

Mount Dickerman and Lake 22 Parking Lots Closed

Posted by Andrew Engelson at Sep 29, 2008 12:18 PM |

Mount Dickerman and Lake 22 Parking Lots Closed

Hiker on the summit of Mount Dickerman. Photo by Ed Giecek.

The parking lots at two popular trailheads on the Mountain Loop Highway are going to be closed this fall for upgrades. Both of these trails are very popular, and in one case not much alternate parking is going to be available, so you should consider this before heading out to these trails.

The first is the Mount  Dickerman trailhead. The parking area closes today, Sept. 29 and will remain closed until April 2009. Construction will increase the parking lot from 20 spaces to 70 in order to add parking for the Perry Creek Trail. A connector trail is being built from the Perry Creek Trail to the Dickerman trailhead (WTA volunteers have done a lot of work here), and when it is finished, the Perry Creek Road will be closed. The Mount Dickerman trailhead is located on the Mountain Loop Highway at milepost 27.3, east of Granite Falls.

The second closure is at Lake Twenty-two trailhead. The parking area will close approximately Oct. 13 until the end of the year. The parking lot will expand from 30 to 48 spaces, and gain new toilets and signs. Some parking will be available across the highway in the nearby Hemple Creek picnic area. Lake Twenty-two trailhead is located on the Mount Loop Highway at milepost 13.2, east of Granite Falls.

Hikers should plan ahead and expect crowded conditions at these trailheads until work is completed, especially at Mount Dickerman, where the Forest Service says essentially no parking will be available until spring.

Perry Creek Road to be permanently closed

Posted by Tim McNitt at Sep 30, 2008 03:28 PM
An easily overlooked consequence of the improvement to the Mt. Dickerman trailhead is that the closing of the Perry Creek road will add 3 miles round trip to the Perry Creek Trail. I just confirmed that fact with Carol Gladsjo at the Forest Service. It means the current 8 mile round trip day hike to the meadows will become an 11 mile overnight. Also, the moderate 4 mile round trip to the falls will become a 7 mile hike.

One of the unique features of Perry Creek is the amazing diversity of ferns found there (34 species at last count). The greatest diversity of ferns is within 1 mile of the falls, so older fern enthusiasts who can handle 4 miles, but not 7, will no longer be able to enjoy the Perry Creek Trail.

Perry Creek Road to be permanently closed

Posted by Kevin Steffa at Oct 23, 2008 12:41 PM
I think that a decision to close this road should raise a few eyebrows... In a district where so many roads are in bad shape due to flooding, this road raises few red flags for washouts or slope failure. Why are resources therefore being spent to close a road that serves its purpose, when it appears that the net affect is reduced access? I do not think that this would be very popular with the hiking community - to justify their forest pass money.

It is especially nice to have this road option open in the off-season, when short daylight hours limit the extra mileage hikeable. I dont think that parking is a problem on all but the busiest of summer weekends.

Does this mean that other trailheads in the area, that are similarly located on spur roads, also in danger. There are many: Whitechuck, Bedal Creek, Goat Lake, Vesper Peak. I do not think anyone is proposing clipping these other access points, so why do we need to actually 'close' the perry creek road as long as it is in decent condition?

Now, I can see a few benefits of lengthening this particular trail and consolidating trailheads:

- Additional Trail: There are some potential viewpoints from rock outcrops under the lower flanks of Dickerman traversing over to Forgotten. Looking out over low points of the valley from Vesper to Big 4 is indeed impressive. If a vantage point were a feature of the trail (or side viewpoint), it would not seem like just adding 'slog' mileage to get to the 'interesting stuff'. Similarly, if the forest contained some nice big trees rather than the typical second-growth jungle, it might be a nice additional few miles.

- Consolidation of access: So, now that there is this big consolidated trailhead hub, how about making this the new 'mountain loop snowpark' for winter access? I must confess that Deer Creek does not impress! If we could send the snowplows a bit further up the road to this new trailhead, perhaps assisted by some snowpark pass dollars, then there is a good justification for consolidating trailheads. This area really shines in the wintertime for snowshoeing/skiing, yet the best parts are just out of reach without a long road hike. This would be a good trade in terms of access, and help to offset the persistent overcrowding of the passes in wintertime.

Thanks for the thoughts, and I hope that discussion remains open about this area.

powered by Plone | site by ONE/Northwest and served with clean energy